Running a radiology service
Radiology report turnaround time: what is normal, what is safe, and how it is measured
Radiology report turnaround time is measured from the moment a study is complete on the scanner to the moment a final signed report is available. There is no Indian statutory benchmark; each provider quotes its own targets, and the numbers in their marketing are not comparable unless you know where each clock starts and stops.
How turnaround time is defined and measured
Turnaround time (TAT) is the interval from study completion to final signed report. That sounds simple, but a study passes through six states on its way, and every provider chooses which two to measure between. The states are:
- Acquired. The technologist finishes the scan and closes the study on the console.
- Available. The complete study, every series, has arrived at the reporting service. On a slow link this can be many minutes after acquisition.
- Assigned. The study has been offered or allocated to a specific radiologist.
- Accepted. The radiologist has opened it and taken responsibility for it.
- Preliminary. A preliminary result has been issued, where the workflow uses one.
- Final. The final report is signed and delivered.
Delays hide in the gaps. Between acquired and available: incomplete transfers, a gateway waiting for the last series, a study sent without a clinical history that has to be chased. Between available and assigned: nobody credentialed for that modality is on shift, or the worklist is a pool nobody picks from. Between assigned and accepted: the offered radiologist is busy and there is no backup route. Between accepted and final: the read itself, which is the only part most people picture. A provider that starts its clock at “accepted” and stops it at “preliminary” will look twice as fast as one that measures from “available” to “final” on identical work.
Ask for the definition, not the number. A turnaround figure means nothing until the provider states the start state, the stop state, whether the figure is a mean, a median or a percentile, and whether nights and weekends are included.
What providers in India quote
The figures below are what four Indian providers and one state scheme publish. They are marketing and tender figures, not audited results, and each uses its own measurement points.
| Provider or scheme | Published turnaround | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 5C Network | Around 30 minutes routine; 15 minutes STAT1 | Quoted as averages across modalities; STAT carries a published surcharge of 20 to 40 percent10. |
| DeepTek | 45 minutes X-ray, 90 minutes CT, 120 minutes MRI2 | Stated as inclusive of quality assurance, which is unusual and worth asking others about. |
| Krsnaa Diagnostics | STAT 30 to 60 minutes; CT 2 to 4 hours; MRI 4 to 8 hours3 | Employed hub model, largely public-private partnership contracts. |
| NHM Assam free diagnostic scheme | Within 6 hours by day; by 10 AM for night studies4 | A government service level written into a scheme, for X-ray under a PPP contract. |
The spread, from 30 minutes to 8 hours for comparable modalities, is the point. These are not measurements of the same thing. A hospital comparing providers should ask each to restate its figure against the six states above. The guide to teleradiology companies in India compares the providers on the other dimensions.
What the ACR says
The American College of Radiology’s White Paper on Teleradiology Practice is the most-cited professional statement on the subject. Its position on turnaround is that the expectation for a teleradiology read should be “not more or less stringent” than for on-site radiology: remote reporting is not a licence to be slower, nor a reason to demand speed that an on-site department would not be held to5. The same paper insists that the remote radiologist have access to prior studies and clinical context, describes reads without them as lower value, and expects the service to run a discrepancy process, peer review, addenda and an audit-trailed critical-result acknowledgement5. Speed without these is not a service level; it is a queue.
Priorities and why they are set at intake
Three priorities are standard. Routine is the default for outpatient and ward studies where the result is needed within the working day or the next. Urgent is for inpatients or outpatients whose management is waiting on the result within hours. STAT is for the emergency department and intensive care, where the result is needed immediately.
Priority belongs to the order, not the reader. It should be set at intake by the site, from the referrer’s request and the site’s own rules, and it should only ever move upwards: a radiologist who discovers something serious in a routine study can raise it, but nobody should be able to lower a STAT to routine because the queue is long. Large platforms enforce this algorithmically, with STAT assignment mandatory rather than self-selected78. The alternative, a pool where radiologists choose what to read, rewards picking the easy studies and leaves the difficult STAT at the bottom.
Critical results communication
Turnaround measures when the report was signed. It says nothing about whether anyone who could act on it knew. A critical finding, such as an intracranial haemorrhage or a pulmonary embolism, needs a closed loop: direct communication with a responsible clinician, and a record of it.
| Element | What the record should show |
|---|---|
| Who | The named person reached at the site, and their role; and the radiologist who made the call. |
| When | Time of the finding, time of the first attempt, time of acknowledgement. |
| Channel | Telephone, WhatsApp, SMS, in-platform message; and which of them succeeded. |
| Acknowledgement | Explicit confirmation from the recipient that the finding was understood, not a delivery receipt. |
| Escalation | What happens if nobody answers: a second contact, the site coordinator, the medical superintendent, and after how long. |
The ACR communication parameter expects such non-routine communication to be documented, and the teleradiology white paper expects the acknowledgement to be audit-trailed65. Hospital systems in other countries have built multi-pathway acknowledgement into the electronic record, including mobile phone integration9; in an Indian tier-2 hospital at 2 AM the pathway that works is usually a phone call to a named coordinator, and the contract should name that person.
Service-level targets versus guarantees
A service-level target is a commitment to report a defined proportion of studies within a defined time, measured between defined states, with a remedy if missed. A guarantee is a promise that every study will be reported within a time. In a service that depends on human radiologists, a study that arrives incomplete, a link that drops, and a run of STATs in the same hour all exist, so a guarantee without exceptions is either a slogan or is quietly priced to fail. “Guaranteed 15 minutes” with no stated bench of radiologists on shift, no percentile and no credit is a red flag, not a feature.
The honest form is a target per priority, per site, with a percentile (for example, the proportion of STAT studies reported within the target), monthly reporting, and service credits against the invoice for studies that miss. Credits make the target real, because they cost the provider something. Escalation rights after a sustained miss make it enforceable.
How to write turnaround into a contract
| Clause | What to specify |
|---|---|
| Definitions | Start state (study complete and received) and stop state (final signed report delivered). Whether preliminary reports count. Time zone and clock source. |
| Targets by priority | Separate targets for routine, urgent and STAT, and by modality where they differ. Stated as a time and a percentile, not a single mean. |
| Shifts and coverage | Which hours are covered, whether night and weekend targets differ, and the minimum number of credentialed radiologists on the roster for the site’s modalities. |
| Exclusions | Studies received incomplete, without a clinical history, or during a documented outage on the hospital side. Keep the list short and require the provider to notify the site at the time. |
| Priority rules | Who sets priority, that it is set at intake, and that it can be raised but not lowered. |
| Critical results | The site’s named contacts by shift, the channels in order, the acknowledgement required, the escalation path and its timing. |
| Reporting | Monthly statement of volumes, turnaround per priority and modality, misses, critical-result log and discrepancy rate. |
| Remedies | Service credits per late study or per percentage point of miss; escalation meeting after a defined number of months below target; termination right after a sustained breach. |
| Term | Monthly with notice is achievable; a 12 to 24 month lock-in in exchange for a turnaround promise should be questioned. |
Turnaround belongs alongside the quality clauses, not instead of them; the guide to peer review and discrepancy rates sets out what those should say.
How Raydiac handles it
Raydiac does not publish a single turnaround number, because a number without a measurement definition and a roster behind it is not a commitment. Instead, each site agreement sets a service-level target per priority, routine, urgent and STAT, for CT and MRI. The timer starts when the complete study is received and every order shows a visible countdown against its target on the worklist. Priority is set by the site at intake and can only be raised. STAT orders go to the top of every eligible credentialed radiologist’s list, with a backup route if the first offer is not accepted in time. Compliance is reported to the site monthly, and service credits apply when Raydiac misses its target.
Critical findings open a closed-loop task that records who was called, on which channel, when they acknowledged, and what escalation followed, and the outcome is written into the report. Turnaround is measured alongside random-sample peer review and discrepancy rates, not in place of them. How this works for a hospital is described on the page for hospitals and diagnostic centres, and the roster model for overnight cover is on the night and emergency reporting page.
Questions people ask
What is a normal turnaround time for a CT report in India?
When does the turnaround clock start?
What does STAT mean in radiology?
Is a faster report always better?
What is a critical result, and how quickly must it be communicated?
What happens if a provider misses its turnaround target?
Sources
- 1.5C Network, “Teleradiology Services India” (average around 30 minutes, STAT 15 minutes; accessed 3 September 2026)
- 2.DeepTek, “Teleradiology Company in India” (45 minutes X-ray, 90 minutes CT, 120 minutes MRI, inclusive of QA; accessed 3 September 2026)
- 3.Krsnaa Diagnostics, “Teleradiology” (STAT 30 to 60 minutes, CT 2 to 4 hours, MRI 4 to 8 hours; accessed 3 September 2026)
- 4.NHM Assam, “Chief Minister’s Free Diagnostic Services Programme” (reports within 6 hours by day or by 10 AM for night studies)
- 5.Silva E. et al., “ACR White Paper on Teleradiology Practice”, J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10:575-585
- 6.American College of Radiology, “Practice Parameter for Communication of Diagnostic Imaging Findings” (Revised 2025)
- 7.vRad, “The vRad Platform” (algorithmic STAT assignment; accessed 3 September 2026)
- 8.Intelerad, “Outsmarting the Radiology Workflow Management Problem” (accessed 3 September 2026)
- 9.Academic Radiology, “Critical Results Notification System in the Electronic Health Record” (2025)
- 10.5C Network, “Outsource radiology reporting in India” (STAT surcharge of 20 to 40 percent), 20 May 2026
This guide is general information for hospitals, diagnostic centres and radiologists in India. It is not legal, tax or medical advice. Regulations change; check the primary source before acting, and see the medical disclaimer.