Standards and technology
PACS, RIS, DICOM and HL7 explained: how a radiology department’s systems fit together
PACS stores and displays images. RIS schedules the patient and holds the report. DICOM is the file format and network protocol the scanner speaks. HL7 and FHIR carry the order and the result between systems. This guide explains what each one does, how a study travels from scanner to signed report, and what a small centre actually needs to buy.
The five systems in one sentence each
- PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System) is the server and software that store medical images and let clinicians view them.
- RIS (Radiology Information System) is the department’s administrative system: bookings, patient registration, worklists, report text, billing.
- DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) is the file format and network protocol every CT and MRI scanner uses to write and send images.
- HL7 v2 is the messaging standard hospital systems use to pass orders and results between the HIS, RIS and PACS.
- FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) is HL7’s modern, web-API standard for health records, and the one the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission uses in India.
These are not competing products; a working department uses all five at once. The rest of this guide takes them in turn, then shows how a remote reporting network such as Raydiac fits alongside them.
What each system does
The open-source entries below are included because most Indian teleradiology and cloud PACS products are built on them, whether or not the vendor says so.
| System | What it stores or does | Who uses it | Typical products and open-source options |
|---|---|---|---|
| PACS | Receives DICOM from scanners, stores it, indexes patients, studies and series, serves images to viewers, answers queries from other systems. | Radiologists, technologists, referring doctors, IT. | Commercial PACS from the scanner vendors and independents; cloud PACS sold per study. Open source: Orthanc (lightweight C++ DICOM server, PostgreSQL index, DICOMweb, scripting)1 and dcm4chee-arc-light (Java, heavier, used in large archives; 5.35.1 released August 2026)5. |
| RIS | Patient registration, scheduling, modality worklist, exam status, report text and signature, billing and referrer management. | Front desk, technologists, radiologists, accounts. | Usually bundled with a HIS or sold as RIS-PACS. There is no widely adopted open-source RIS; small centres often use a practice-management system instead. |
| Viewer | Displays DICOM images with windowing, scrolling, multiplanar reconstruction, measurements and comparison with priors. | Radiologists (diagnostic), clinicians and patients (review). | Desktop viewers, vendor workstations, and web viewers. Open source: OHIF Viewer (MIT licence, v3.13 released July 2026)6. See the DICOM viewer guide. |
| DICOM | Standard, not a product: the file format (pixels plus a header of tags) and the network services for sending, finding and retrieving studies. | Every scanner, PACS and viewer. | Toolkits developers use: DCMTK, pydicom and pynetdicom, dcm4che. |
| HL7 v2 and FHIR | Messaging: orders from the HIS to the RIS (ORM), results back (ORU); FHIR resources such as DiagnosticReport for modern APIs and ABDM. | Integration engineers, HIS and RIS vendors. | Integration engines route and translate messages; the community fork of Mirth Connect is Open Integration Engine. |
How a study flows from scanner to report
A CT or MRI study passes through six stages, and each stage is a hand-off between two of the systems above. Knowing the stages makes it much easier to work out where a delay or a lost study happened.
- Order and worklist. The referrer’s request is entered in the HIS or RIS, which generates an accession number and publishes the patient to a DICOM Modality Worklist. The technologist selects the patient on the scanner console instead of typing the name.
- Acquisition. The scanner writes each image as a DICOM instance, grouped into series (for example, axial bone window, coronal soft tissue) inside one study identified by a Study Instance UID.
- Storage. The console sends the study to the PACS using the DICOM C-STORE service. Where a hospital uses a remote reporting network, the console or PACS also sends a copy to a gateway on the hospital network, which forwards it over HTTPS.
- Viewing. A viewer loads the study from the PACS, either by classic DICOM retrieval or by DICOMweb. Priors from the same patient are fetched for comparison.
- Reporting. The radiologist dictates or types the report in the RIS or a reporting platform, signs it, and the report becomes the definitive record of the examination.
- Delivery. The signed report goes back to the RIS or HIS (HL7 ORU or FHIR DiagnosticReport where these exist), to the referrer, and to the patient, in India often as a PDF by WhatsApp, email or print at the centre.
In a managed teleradiology network the stages are the same; only stages three to five happen partly outside the hospital. The guide to what teleradiology is walks through that version of the flow.
DICOM in more depth
Files, tags and the study hierarchy
A DICOM file is pixel data wrapped in a header of tags. Each tag has a group and element number, for example (0010,0010) for Patient Name, (0008,0050) for Accession Number and (0020,000D) for Study Instance UID. Tags describe the patient, the equipment, the acquisition parameters and the position of the slice in space. The hierarchy is patient, study, series, instance: one patient has many studies, one study has several series, one series contains many instances (slices).
Classic DICOM networking
Three services do most of the work. C-STORE pushes images from one node to another. C-FIND queries a PACS for patients, studies or series matching given tags. C-MOVE asks a PACS to send matching studies to a named destination. Every node has an Application Entity title, an IP address and a port, and both ends must be configured to know each other.
DICOMweb
DICOMweb re-expresses those services as HTTPS APIs: STOW-RS to store, QIDO-RS to query and WADO-RS to retrieve. Because it runs on port 443, the same port every web application uses, it passes through hospital firewalls that would never allow an inbound classic DICOM port7. Orthanc can push a study to a remote DICOMweb server with a bearer token or a client certificate4, which is the mechanism behind most modern gateways, including Raydiac’s.
DICOM TLS
Classic DICOM is unencrypted. DICOM TLS wraps the association in TLS with certificates at both ends, and Orthanc has supported it since version 1.9.03. In practice many installed scanners cannot do it, so the encrypted leg usually starts at a gateway inside the hospital rather than at the console.
De-identification
The DICOM standard defines de-identification profiles that list which tags to remove, replace or keep. Orthanc implements the 2008, 2017c, 2021b and 2023b profiles and exposes them through its API2. Header de-identification does not remove text burned into the pixels, which mainly affects ultrasound and secondary-capture images rather than CT and MRI. Note the distinction between anonymisation, which destroys the link to the patient, and pseudonymisation, which replaces identifiers with a key that can be reversed under control. A diagnostic report must name the patient, so a reporting platform pseudonymises for reading and re-identifies at signing. Raydiac’s security page describes how that vault works.
HL7 v2 and FHIR
HL7 v2 messages are plain text with segments separated by pipes. The two that matter in radiology are ORM (an order: patient, procedure, referrer, priority) flowing from the HIS to the RIS, and ORU (an observation result: the report text and status) flowing back. Most Indian hospital information systems that integrate at all still do it this way.
FHIR is HL7’s current standard, built on REST APIs and JSON resources such as Patient, ServiceRequest, ImagingStudy and DiagnosticReport. In India, the NRCES FHIR Implementation Guide for ABDM defines a DiagnosticReportImaging profile for radiology reports9, and pushing such reports against a patient’s ABHA is the M2 milestone of ABDM. The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s EHR Standards for India, 2016 name DICOM, HL7, SNOMED CT and LOINC as the standards for Indian health records; adoption is voluntary8. See the ABDM guide for what a centre gains by linking reports.
Cloud PACS versus on-premise
An on-premise PACS is a server in the hospital with a licence, a maintenance contract and someone responsible for backups. A cloud PACS is the same software run by a vendor and sold per study or per month, reached through a browser. The table sets out the trade-offs.
| Consideration | On-premise PACS | Cloud PACS |
|---|---|---|
| Upfront cost | Server, storage, licence, installation. | Little or none; per-study pricing. One Indian cloud PACS publishes rates of roughly ₹3 to ₹20 per study10. |
| Internet dependence | Reading works when the link is down. | Everything depends on the link; low bandwidth slows reading unless the viewer streams progressively. |
| Data residency | Data stays in the building. | Ask where the servers are. DPDP Rule 15 (in force from the May 2027 phase) permits transfer abroad unless restricted by order, but hospitals and tenders increasingly want data in India12. |
| Security obligations | The hospital runs backups, patching and access control itself. | The vendor is a processor; the hospital still needs Rule 6 safeguards and a written contract12. |
| Regulatory status | CDSCO’s 2026 software guidance treats storage, archive and communication software and image management systems as not medical device software, unless they analyse images to aid diagnosis13. | |
| Exit | The data is yours to migrate. | Check how you get a full DICOM export at the end of the contract, and at what cost. |
What a small centre actually needs
A single-scanner CT or MRI centre needs four things; the rest can come later.
- A scanner that can send DICOM. Every modern console can; the IT task is to add a destination.
- Somewhere for images to live. Either a PACS (on-premise or cloud) or, at minimum, a gateway that forwards studies to whoever reads them and keeps a local copy for the retention period.
- A viewer. For the reporting radiologist, a diagnostic-grade display and a viewer with MPR and measurements; for referrers and patients, a web link or a CD or film.
- A reporting tool. Something that produces a signed report with the patient identifiers, the radiologist’s name, qualification and registration number, and keeps it for the record.
How a teleradiology gateway fits. Raydiac installs a small Orthanc-based edge gateway on the centre’s network. The console sends the study to it by C-STORE exactly as it would to a PACS; the gateway forwards it to Raydiac over HTTPS with a per-site client certificate and buffers up to 30 days if the internet drops. The radiologist reads the full study in a browser OHIF viewer, and the signed report comes back as a PDF by portal, email or WhatsApp. The centre keeps whatever PACS it has, or none. Details are on the page for hospitals and diagnostic centres.
Questions to ask a vendor
- Which DICOM services do you support: C-STORE, C-FIND, C-MOVE, DICOMweb STOW, QIDO and WADO? Which do you need from my scanner?
- Does data leave the hospital encrypted, and by what mechanism (DICOM TLS, HTTPS, VPN)? What happens when the internet is down?
- Where are the servers, who operates them, and is any patient data sent outside India?
- How is patient identity handled during reading: full identifiers, anonymised, or pseudonymised and restored at signing?
- What does the viewer support: multiplanar reconstruction, measurements, priors side by side, hanging protocols? Does it need a plugin or a download?
- How do reports come back: PDF only, HL7 ORU, FHIR DiagnosticReport, or ABDM push? Which of these exist today and which are on the roadmap?
- How long are images and reports retained, and how do I export everything if I leave?
- What is the pricing unit (per study, per month, per user), what is included, and is there a lock-in period?
Vendors sometimes describe integration as “72 hours via DICOM, no hardware required”11. That is achievable when the hospital already has a PACS that can push to the internet. When it does not, a gateway is the honest answer.
Questions people ask
What is the difference between PACS and DICOM?
Does a small CT centre need a RIS?
Can a scanner send images directly to a teleradiology company?
Is DICOM data encrypted?
What is the difference between HL7 and FHIR?
Is cloud PACS legal for patient data in India?
What does Orthanc do, and is it a full PACS?
Sources
- 1.Orthanc, “About the Orthanc project” (accessed 3 September 2026)
- 2.Orthanc Book, “Anonymization and modification” (DICOM de-identification profiles 2008, 2017c, 2021b, 2023b)
- 3.Orthanc Book, “Configuring DICOM TLS”
- 4.Orthanc Book, “DICOMweb plugin” (STOW-RS push with bearer token or client certificate)
- 5.dcm4che, dcm4chee-arc-light releases (5.35.1, 25 August 2026)
- 6.OHIF, release notes v3.13 (July 2026; MIT licence)
- 7.Medicai, “What is DICOMweb?” (HTTPS on port 443)
- 8.Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, “Electronic Health Record (EHR) Standards for India, 2016”
- 9.NRCES, FHIR Implementation Guide for ABDM, profile DiagnosticReportImaging
- 10.Gratirad, “Pricing” (cloud PACS per-study pricing, accessed 3 September 2026)
- 11.5C Network, “Teleradiology for Government Hospitals in India” (PACS integration via DICOM, accessed 3 September 2026)
- 12.DPDP Rules 2025, Rule 15 (cross-border transfer) and Rule 6 (reasonable security safeguards), summary pages
- 13.CDSCO, Guidance Document on Medical Device Software, CDSCO/MD/GD/MDSW/01/2026, circular of 21 July 2026, section 5.2
This guide is general information for hospitals, diagnostic centres and radiologists in India. It is not legal, tax or medical advice. Regulations change; check the primary source before acting, and see the medical disclaimer.